<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PokerString.com &#187; decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerstring.com/tag/decision/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerstring.com</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of poker quotes by famous players</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Brian Townsend, on variance</title>
		<link>http://pokerstring.com/poker-in-general/brian-townsend-on-variance</link>
		<comments>http://pokerstring.com/poker-in-general/brian-townsend-on-variance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poker in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good players]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Townsend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerstring.com/?p=284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think games with variance built into them are so much better than games with no variance modifier.  In chess there is always an optimum move.  In the same way poker has an optimum move or decision as well, but its often much much harder to see that or even think about that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><img src="http://pokerstring.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/favico.gif" alt="favico" title="favico" width="16" height="16" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-44" />I think games with variance built into them are so much better than games with no variance modifier.  In chess there is always an optimum move.  In the same way poker has an optimum move or decision as well, but its often much much harder to see that or even think about that correct decision as there is so much fluctuation that its tough to tell if that move is correct.  To learn by trail and error is incredibly time consuming in poker and takes years to master a game. [...]<br />
But its this variance that creates the illusion to people that they are winning poker players.  Its this variance that has given action and made millions of dollars for me over the years.</p></blockquote>
<p>Brian Townsend &#8211; 02/2010 &#8211; in <a href="http://blogs.cardrunners.com/Brian/frustration-1265058797" target="blank">CardRunners Blog</a><br />
<br /><div style="float:right">
<script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-9568843012341945";
/* Pokerstring_text_468x60 */
google_ad_slot = "3789420442";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 60;
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerstring.com/poker-in-general/brian-townsend-on-variance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Mamet, on courage</title>
		<link>http://pokerstring.com/poker-in-general/david-mamet-on-courage</link>
		<comments>http://pokerstring.com/poker-in-general/david-mamet-on-courage#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poker in General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mamet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerstring.com/?p=194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In poker, one must have courage: the courage to bet, to back one&#8217;s convictions, one&#8217;s intuitions, one&#8217;s understanding. There can be no victory without courage. The successful player must be willing to wager on likelihoods. Should he wait for absolutely risk-free certainty, he will win nothing, regardless of the cards he is dealt.
David Mamet &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><img src="http://pokerstring.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/favico.gif" alt="favico" title="favico" width="16" height="16" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-44" />In poker, one must have courage: the courage to bet, to back one&#8217;s convictions, one&#8217;s intuitions, one&#8217;s understanding. There can be no victory without courage. The successful player must be willing to wager on likelihoods. Should he wait for absolutely risk-free certainty, he will win nothing, regardless of the cards he is dealt.</p></blockquote>
<p>David Mamet &#8211; 09/2005 &#8211; in Los Angeles Times<br />
<!-- Could not fetch banners, either there are no banners or none qualified for this location! --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerstring.com/poker-in-general/david-mamet-on-courage/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lou Krieger, on game selection</title>
		<link>http://pokerstring.com/poker-strategy/lou-krieger-on-game-selection</link>
		<comments>http://pokerstring.com/poker-strategy/lou-krieger-on-game-selection#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Poker Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krieger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerstring.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe the single most important decision in any form of poker is game selection; determining which cards to enter a hand with runs a close second. 
Lou Krieger &#8211; in Lou Krieger Online
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><img src="http://pokerstring.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/favico.gif" alt="favico" title="favico" width="16" height="16" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-44" />I believe the single most important decision in any form of poker is game selection; determining which cards to enter a hand with runs a close second. </p></blockquote>
<p>Lou Krieger &#8211; in <a href="http://www.loukrieger.com/">Lou Krieger Online</a><br />
<!-- Could not fetch banners, either there are no banners or none qualified for this location! --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pokerstring.com/poker-strategy/lou-krieger-on-game-selection/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

